Side-by-side comparison

Compare investment strategies

Long-Term Inflation Protection Portfolio vs Better Than a CD: Tech Trend with T-Bill Defense

At a glance

The headline numbers each source publishes, lined up. Hover a number for its exact definition.

These strategies report performance on different (Backtest, OOS). Live and composite results come from real accounts; out-of-sample, hypothetical and model results don't. Compare return and risk with care.

12.8%Best

6.3%

21.1%Best

4.8%

22.4%

1.4%Best

0.85

3.47Best

-35.5%

-0.5%Best

Minimum investment

$100

—

Each source uses its own scale

3(1-5 risk tolerance (AInvest))

—

Holdings

—

80%Best

40%

Growth of $10,000

Each line starts at $10,000 on the first date all of them share, using the strategy's own published history. Bases are labelled and never mixed within a line.

Long-Term Inflation Protection PortfolioBacktestup 107.7%
S&P 500 ETFup 84.5%

No published history to chart: Better Than a CD: Tech Trend with T-Bill Defense.

Every published figureShow 39 attributes

Each row is one exact variant (window and basis), so a value appears only where a source publishes it.

Classification

AI categories (Composer)

—

bonds/gold, inverse/short, leveraged etfs, mean reversion, sector rotation, tactical asset allocation, trend-following, volatility hedged

Asset classes / instruments

equities, fixed income

equities

Investment purpose (AInvest)

inflation-hedging, retirement-planning

—

Section on AInvest's ETF portfolio page

Multi-Factor

—

Tags (AInvest)

defensive, retirement

—

Scores

AInvest cost score (0-100)

—

AInvest diversification score (0-100)

—

AInvest momentum score (0-100)

—

AInvest overall score (0-100)

—

AInvest return score (0-100)

—

AInvest risk score (0-100)

—

Returns

Best and worst calendar year (AInvest)

best: [object Object] · worst: [object Object]

—

Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest)

20.73%

—

Return, last 30 days (backtest)

0.69%

—

Return, last 365 days (backtest)

12.82%

—

Return, last 90 days (backtest)

0.42%

—

Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample)

—

4.85%

Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample)

—

4.53%

Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample)

—

0.38%

Return, trailing 1 year (out-of-sample)

—

6.30%

Return, trailing 3 months (out-of-sample)

—

1.75%

Return, whole backtest (annualized) (backtest)

21.11%

—

Return, whole backtest (cumulative) (backtest)

346.73%

—

Return, year to date (backtest)

13.89%

—

Risk metrics

Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

9.16

Maximum drawdown period (AInvest)

peak: 2021-12 · months: 9 · trough: 2022-09

—

Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest)

-31.74%

—

Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

-0.53%

Maximum drawdown, whole backtest (backtest)

-35.47%

—

Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest)

0.80

—

Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

3.47

Sharpe ratio, whole backtest (backtest)

0.85

—

Sortino ratio, whole backtest (backtest)

1.19

—

Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

1.37%

Volatility, whole backtest (backtest)

22.44%

—

Cost & access

Minimum investment

$100

—

Construction

Rebalance frequency

monthly

daily

Risk score

Risk tolerance (AInvest)

moderate

—

Risk tolerance 1-5 (AInvest)

—

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources