Side-by-side comparison

Compare investment strategies

60/40 Balanced Allocation Portfolio vs Weekly Momentum Allocator: ETFs, Blue Chips and Growth

At a glance

The headline numbers each source publishes, lined up. Hover a number for its exact definition.

These strategies report performance on different (Backtest, OOS). Live and composite results come from real accounts; out-of-sample, hypothetical and model results don't. Compare return and risk with care.

13.0%

—

8.0%

103.1%Best

22.8%

11.4%Best

0.33

6.66Best

-38.9%

-1.6%Best

Minimum investment

$100

—

Each source uses its own scale

3(1-5 risk tolerance (AInvest))

—

Holdings

—

90%Best

40%

Growth of $10,000

Each line starts at $10,000 on the first date all of them share, using the strategy's own published history. Bases are labelled and never mixed within a line.

60/40 Balanced Allocation PortfolioBacktestup 59.7%
S&P 500 ETFup 84.5%

No published history to chart: Weekly Momentum Allocator: ETFs, Blue Chips and Growth.

Every published figureShow 37 attributes

Each row is one exact variant (window and basis), so a value appears only where a source publishes it.

Classification

AI categories (Composer)

—

ballast (cash/dividends/gold/tips/energy), blue chips, growth/ai tilt, multi-asset rotation, recent-winner selection, weekly rebalance

Asset classes / instruments

equities, fixed income

equities

Investment purpose (AInvest)

retirement-planning, long-term-wealth-accumulation

—

Section on AInvest's ETF portfolio page

Popular

—

Tags (AInvest)

balanced, core

—

Scores

AInvest cost score (0-100)

—

AInvest diversification score (0-100)

—

AInvest momentum score (0-100)

—

AInvest overall score (0-100)

—

AInvest return score (0-100)

—

AInvest risk score (0-100)

—

Returns

Best and worst calendar year (AInvest)

best: [object Object] · worst: [object Object]

—

Return, backtest period (annualized) (backtest)

7.50%

—

Return, last 30 days (backtest)

1.30%

—

Return, last 365 days (backtest)

12.99%

—

Return, last 90 days (backtest)

1.16%

—

Return, out-of-sample period (annualized) (out-of-sample)

—

103.09%

Return, out-of-sample period (cumulative) (out-of-sample)

—

4.90%

Return, trailing 1 month (out-of-sample)

—

-4.41%

Return, whole backtest (annualized) (backtest)

7.98%

—

Return, whole backtest (cumulative) (backtest)

82.22%

—

Return, year to date (backtest)

4.94%

—

Risk metrics

Calmar ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

64.30

Maximum drawdown period (AInvest)

peak: 2021-08 · months: 26 · trough: 2023-10

—

Maximum drawdown, backtest period (backtest)

-30.58%

—

Maximum drawdown, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

-1.60%

Maximum drawdown, whole backtest (backtest)

-38.85%

—

Sharpe ratio, backtest period (backtest)

0.13

—

Sharpe ratio, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

6.66

Sharpe ratio, whole backtest (backtest)

0.33

—

Sortino ratio, whole backtest (backtest)

0.47

—

Standard deviation, out-of-sample period (out-of-sample)

—

11.42%

Volatility, whole backtest (backtest)

22.85%

—

Cost & access

Minimum investment

$100

—

Construction

Rebalance frequency

monthly

weekly

Risk score

Risk tolerance (AInvest)

moderate

—

Risk tolerance 1-5 (AInvest)

—

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources

Compare investment strategies

At a glance

Growth of $10,000

What they say: stated rules

What they hold

Do the holdings back the rules?

Costs, access & sources